Research on the usage behavior of generative artificial intelligence: taking a legislative assistant as an example

Dec 1, 2024·
Dylan Chiang
Dylan Chiang
· 2 min read
Abstract
This study explores the use of generative artificial intelligence in the work of legislative assistants, and analyzes its impact on legislative work efficiency, decision-making quality, and work processes. Through an in-depth study of how legislative assistants use generative AI tools to handle daily work tasks, this study aims to understand the application model, user acceptance, and potential influencing factors of AI technology in the political work environment.
Type
Publication
Master’s thesis

Summary

This study explores the use of generative artificial intelligence in the work of legislative assistants, and analyzes its impact on legislative work efficiency, decision-making quality, and work processes.


Reference errata (Errata, 2026-06-12)

After this paper was deposited, the author used the self-developed citation verification tool [citation-verify] (https://github.com/DylanChiang-Dev/liberal-arts-research-skills) to review all 47 references. The following clerical errors at the bibliographic level were found and were publicly corrected in accordance with academic practice. **The above errors do not affect the argument and conclusion of this paper. **

**DOI correction (original DOI is parsable, but points to other article): **

EntryOriginal DOI (wrong)Corrected DOI
Brooks, Longstreet, & Califf (2017)10.17705/1thci.0000910.17705/1thci.00091
De Vries, Tummers, & Bekkers (2018)10.1093/ppmgov/gvx00310.1093/ppmgov/gvy001
Wu & Lin (2016)10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.01110.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.028

Signature correction:

  • Thomas, E., & Rogers, B. E. M. (1998) → should be Backer, T. E., & Rogers, E. M. (1998)
  • “Perceived usefulness… (n.d.). MIS Quarterly” → should be Davis, F. D. (1989), MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340

In addition, the author/source information of 7 online source entries has been completed, and 2 duplicate entries have been deleted. The complete errata and verification methods can be found in [Actual Test Case 001] (https://github.com/DylanChiang-Dev/liberal-arts-research-skills/blob/main/examples/2026-06-12-master-thesis-case.md).


English Title

A Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence Use Behavior: Evidence from Legislative Assistants

Chapter 1 Introduction

1.1 Research background and motivation

(To be added)

1.2 Research purposes and questions

(To be added)

1.3 Research scope and limitations

(To be added)

Chapter 2 Literature Discussion

(To be added)

2.2 Technology Application in Political Work

(To be added)

2.3 Using behavioral theory

(To be added)

Chapter 3 Research Methods

3.1 Research design

(To be added)

3.2 Research objects and samples

(To be added)

3.3 Data collection method

(To be added)

3.4 Data analysis methods

(To be added)

Chapter 4 Research Results

4.1 Descriptive statistical analysis

(To be added)

4.2 Using behavior analysis

(To be added)

4.3 Analysis of influencing factors

(To be added)

Chapter 5 Discussion and Suggestions

5.1 Discussion of Research Findings

(To be added)

5.2 Practical suggestions

(To be added)

5.3 Research limitations and future research directions

(To be added)

Chapter 6 Conclusion

(To be added)

References

(To be added)

Appendix

(To be added)